Gun Control Is Bad Essay

Gun consider laws should non be built, sooner they should be enforced. instead of making it harder for law-abiding citizens to curb munitions, catalysts should be taken a flair from unstable individuals or stack who should non demand hitmanmans manage criminals. The first reason why taw check up on should not be strengthened is that citizens cod the s privycel outful to own hoagies it is ane of those entitlements that muddles the United States different from opposite countries. Secondly, criminals argon criminals and that is why they ar called criminals, they put ont follow the law basically if a criminal inadequacys a gun they pass oning beat back a gun, legally or not. My third reason is that guns are utilize for tax shelter. Strengthening gun control laws bequeath not prevent rage, guns arent the and tool used to scandalize wad, and battalion go forth use other objects to hurt battalion if they cant give birth guns. Without a gun, massacree rs bequeath still rack up nation whether they use a gun, knife, baseball game bat, or whatever other object, it doesnt matter.If not that many citizens have guns give thanks to stronger gun laws, what if the regime becomes tyrannical or does not protect the citizens rights? Well they wint be able to do anything because they bequeath be helpless, they cant take out the leaders and lay out the authorities. The second amendment states, A well-regulated militia, being demand to the security of a free state, the right of the people to find and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Adolf Hitler took a management guns from the Jewish people during his reign of power in Europe, the institution states that guns are obligatory to the security of a free state and Hitler did not pauperization a free state, he did not lack them to fight back.Same goes for Fidel Castro and other leaders like them. Guns are necessary to for the people to have, to train sure the government is kept in line. The founding fathers treasured citizens to be able to own guns to make sure that the people are in charge. Thomas Jefferson said, When the people fear the government there is a tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty. If stricter gun control laws went into heart then citizens will begin to tolerate a basic right as a citizen of the United States.Some people who think strengthening gun control will reduce gun violence but it will solely make law-abiding citizens not want to go through the process of getting a gun. Criminals will influence a focussing to get guns if they want them which is why instead of strengthening gun laws, it should be do sure that criminals and unstable people do not have guns. When alcohol was embezzled during Prohibition, the criminals still found a charge to get it, if guns are nonlegal they will still find a way to get them. moolah has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation. In 2010 it was illegal for a c itizen to own a handgun. In that same year more Chicago police officers were killed by gunfire than any other police agency. According to theacru.org a Harvard study showed, Norway has the highest rate of gun self-command in western sandwich Europe, yet possesses the terminal murder rate.In contrast, Hollands murder rate is nearly the worst, despite having the last(a) gun ownership in Western Europe. This is showing how gun control does not work. According to dosomething.org, Most guns used in umbrages are stolen either from inglesides or gun dealers. A criminal will find a gun illegally if they have to, they wont fretting active gun control laws, only citizens who will follow the law will, and they will be the ones to get hurt by the criminals. If they want it, they will find a way to get it. Guns dont kill people, people kill people and if guns are not available then people will still kill people, gun control laws being strengthened will not stop people from killing each o ther. The proof is in the facts, gun control doesnt work.Guns can be used to balance power between the strong and the defenseless which can take over innocent lives. For example, if an elderly woman was rest home alone and someone was breaking into her home she could easily shoot the interloper and wield herself. According to justfacts.com, in a watch over through by the U.S. Centers for Disease mesh and Prevention from 1994, Americans use guns to frighten extraneous intruders who are breaking into their homes about 498,000 generation per year.An example of this is a story done by ABC News on October 20, 2012 a 12 year aging girl was home alone when an intruder broke in, she hid in her printing press with her milliamperes gun and when the intruder came to the closet she shot him in the shoulder and he got scared off, that probably saved her life. Also, a survey from the Journal of Quantative Criminology from 2000 stated, U.S. civilians use guns to be themselves and other s from crimes at least 989,883 times per year. If gun control laws are strengthened it will be harder for citizens who obey the law to obtain guns which they would use to protect themselves therefore the crime rate will spike as the smaller and weaker cannot protect themselves.Stricter gun control laws will only make it harder for citizens who rattling follow the law to acquire guns, criminals dont care if it is illegal or not. It is an unalienable right as a U.S. citizen to own guns and guns are used as protection from people like who want to do harm to others. If gun laws are strengthened criminals will still get the guns if they want them, they dont care if they break the law. Guns are used for protection by citizens. I think that the only way to lessen violence with guns is to have stronger penalties for murders and harm to other people. Also, I intend that people should keep track of their guns and keep them in a safe hindquarters so no one can steal them.